1. Hartl, D.L., Molecular melodies in high and low C. Nature Reviews Genetics, 2000. 1(2): p. 145-149.
2. van Belkum, A., et al., Short-sequence DNA repeats in prokaryotic genomes. Microbiology and Molecular Biology Reviews, 1998. 62(2): p. 275-+.
3. Orgel, L.E. and F.H.C. Crick, Selfish DNA - the Ultimate Parasite. Nature, 1980. 284(5757): p. 604-607.
4. Ohno, S., So Much Junk DNA in Our Genome. Brookhaven Symposia in Biology, 1972(23): p. 366-&.
5. Kit, S., Equilibrium Sedimentation in Density Gradients of DNA Preparations from Animal Tissues. Journal of Molecular Biology, 1961. 3(6): p. 711-&.
6. Thierry, A., et al., Megasatellites: a peculiar class of giant minisatellites in genes involved in cell adhesion and pathogenicity in Candida glabrata. Nucleic Acids Research, 2008. 36(18): p. 5970-5982.
7. Weber, J.L. and C. Wong, Mutation of Human Short Tandem Repeats. Human Molecular Genetics, 1993. 2(8): p. 1123-1128.
8. Verstrepen, K.J., et al., Intragenic tandem repeats generate functional variability. Nature Genetics, 2005. 37(9): p. 986-990.
9. Legendre, M., et al., Sequence-based estimation of minisatellite and microsatellite repeat variability. Genome Research, 2007. 17(12): p. 1787-1796.
10. Brinkmann, B., et al., Mutation rate in human microsatellites: Influence of the structure and length of the tandem repeat. American Journal of Human Genetics, 1998. 62(6): p. 1408-1415.
11. Buard, J., et al., Influences of array size and homogeneity on minisatellite mutation. Embo Journal, 1998. 17(12): p. 3495-3502.
12. Gemayel, R., et al., Variable Tandem Repeats Accelerate Evolution of Coding and Regulatory Sequences. Annual Review of Genetics, Vol 44, 2010. 44: p. 445-477.
13. Paques, F., W.Y. Leung, and J.E. Haber, Expansions and contractions in a tandem repeat induced by double-strand break repair. Molecular and Cellular Biology, 1998. 18(4): p. 2045-2054.
14. McMurray, C.T., Mechanisms of trinucleotide repeat instability during human development. Nature Reviews Genetics, 2010. 11(11): p. 786-799.
15. Richard, G.F. and F. Paques, Mini- and microsatellite expansions: the recombination connection. Embo Reports, 2000. 1(2): p. 122-126.
16. Mittelman, D., et al., Hsp90 modulates CAG repeat instability in human cells. Cell Stress & Chaperones, 2010. 15(5): p. 753-759.
17. Schmidt, A.L. and V. Mitter, Microsatellite mutation directed by an external stimulus. Mutation Research-Fundamental and Molecular Mechanisms of Mutagenesis, 2004. 568(2): p. 233-243.
18. Wierdl, M., et al., Destabilization of simple repetitive DNA sequences by transcription in yeast. Genetics, 1996. 143(2): p. 713-721.
19. La Spada, A.R., et al., Androgen receptor gene mutations in X-linked spinal and bulbar muscular atrophy. Nature, 1991. 352(6330): p. 77-9.
20. Verkerk, A.J., et al., Identification of a gene (FMR-1) containing a CGG repeat coincident with a breakpoint cluster region exhibiting length variation in fragile X syndrome. Cell, 1991. 65(5): p. 905-14.
21. A novel gene containing a trinucleotide repeat that is expanded and unstable on Huntington's disease chromosomes. The Huntington's Disease Collaborative Research Group. Cell, 1993. 72(6): p. 971-83.
22. Orr, H.T. and H.Y. Zoghbi, Trinucleotide repeat disorders. Annu Rev Neurosci, 2007. 30: p. 575-621.
23. Weiser, J.N., J.M. Love, and E.R. Moxon, The molecular mechanism of phase variation of H. influenzae lipopolysaccharide. Cell, 1989. 59(4): p. 657-65.
24. Srikhanta, Y.N., et al., Phasevarions mediate random switching of gene expression in pathogenic Neisseria. PLoS Pathog, 2009. 5(4): p. e1000400.
25. De Bolle, X., et al., The length of a tetranucleotide repeat tract in Haemophilus influenzae determines the phase variation rate of a gene with homology to type III DNA methyltransferases. Molecular Microbiology, 2000. 35(1): p. 211-22.
26. Stern, A., et al., Opacity genes in Neisseria gonorrhoeae: control of phase and antigenic variation. Cell, 1986. 47(1): p. 61-71.
27. Hoyer, L.L., The ALS gene family of Candida albicans. Trends in Microbiology, 2001. 9(4): p. 176-80.
28. Young, M.W. and S.A. Kay, Time zones: a comparative genetics of circadian clocks. Nature Reviews Genetics, 2001. 2(9): p. 702-15.
29. Froehlich, A.C., et al., White Collar-1, a circadian blue light photoreceptor, binding to the frequency promoter. Science, 2002. 297(5582): p. 815-9.
30. Lee, K., J.C. Dunlap, and J.J. Loros, Roles for WHITE COLLAR-1 in circadian and general photoperception in Neurospora crassa. Genetics, 2003. 163(1): p. 103-14.
31. Michael, T.P., et al., Simple sequence repeats provide a substrate for phenotypic variation in the Neurospora crassa circadian clock. PLoS One, 2007. 2(8): p. e795.
32. Sawyer, L.A., et al., Natural variation in a Drosophila clock gene and temperature compensation. Science, 1997. 278(5346): p. 2117-20.
33. Carroll, S.B., Endless forms: the evolution of gene regulation and morphological diversity. Cell, 2000. 101(6): p. 577-80.
34. Fondon, J.W., 3rd and H.R. Garner, Molecular origins of rapid and continuous morphological evolution. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A, 2004. 101(52): p. 18058-63.
35. Stein, G.S., et al., Runx2 control of organization, assembly and activity of the regulatory machinery for skeletal gene expression. Oncogene, 2004. 23(24): p. 4315-29.
36. Lee, B., et al., Missense mutations abolishing DNA binding of the osteoblast-specific transcription factor OSF2/CBFA1 in cleidocranial dysplasia. Nature Genetics, 1997. 16(3): p. 307-10.
37. Sears, K.E., et al., The correlated evolution of Runx2 tandem repeats, transcriptional activity, and facial length in carnivora. Evol Dev, 2007. 9(6): p. 555-65.
38. Vinces, M.D., et al., Unstable tandem repeats in promoters confer transcriptional evolvability. Science, 2009. 324(5931): p. 1213-6.
39. Smith, R.L. and A.D. Johnson, Turning genes off by Ssn6-Tup1: a conserved system of transcriptional repression in eukaryotes. Trends in Biochemical Sciences, 2000. 25(7): p. 325-30.
40. DeRisi, J.L., V.R. Iyer, and P.O. Brown, Exploring the metabolic and genetic control of gene expression on a genomic scale. Science, 1997. 278(5338): p. 680-6.
41. Green, S.R. and A.D. Johnson, Promoter-dependent roles for the Srb10 cyclin-dependent kinase and the Hda1 deacetylase in Tup1-mediated repression in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Molecular Biology of the Cell, 2004. 15(9): p. 4191-202.
42. Keleher, C.A., et al., Ssn6-Tup1 is a general repressor of transcription in yeast. Cell, 1992. 68(4): p. 709-19.
43. Varanasi, U.S., et al., The Cyc8 (Ssn6)-Tup1 corepressor complex is composed of one Cyc8 and four Tup1 subunits. Molecular and Cellular Biology, 1996. 16(12): p. 6707-14.
44. Williams, F.E., U. Varanasi, and R.J. Trumbly, The CYC8 and TUP1 proteins involved in glucose repression in Saccharomyces cerevisiae are associated in a protein complex. Molecular and Cellular Biology, 1991. 11(6): p. 3307-16.
45. Tzamarias, D. and K. Struhl, Functional dissection of the yeast Cyc8-Tup1 transcriptional co-repressor complex. Nature, 1994. 369(6483): p. 758-61.
46. Agger, K., et al., UTX and JMJD3 are histone H3K27 demethylases involved in HOX gene regulation and development. Nature, 2007. 449(7163): p. 731-4.
47. Hwang, C.S., et al., Ssn6, an important factor of morphological conversion and virulence in Candida albicans. Molecular Microbiology, 2003. 47(4): p. 1029-43.
48. Schultz, J., L. Marshall-Carlson, and M. Carlson, The N-terminal TPR region is the functional domain of SSN6, a nuclear phosphoprotein of Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Molecular and Cellular Biology, 1990. 10(9): p. 4744-56.
49. Smith, R.L., M.J. Redd, and A.D. Johnson, The tetratricopeptide repeats of Ssn6 interact with the homeo domain of alpha 2. Genes Dev, 1995. 9(23): p. 2903-10.
50. Tzamarias, D. and K. Struhl, Distinct TPR motifs of Cyc8 are involved in recruiting the Cyc8-Tup1 corepressor complex to differentially regulated promoters. Genes Dev, 1995. 9(7): p. 821-31.
51. Patel, B.K., J. Gavin-Smyth, and S.W. Liebman, The yeast global transcriptional co-repressor protein Cyc8 can propagate as a prion. Nat Cell Biol, 2009. 11(3): p. 344-9.
52. Palaiomylitou, M., et al., Investigating the structural stability of the Tup1-interaction domain of Ssn6: evidence for a conformational change on the complex. Proteins, 2007. 70(1): p. 72-82.
53. Wong, K.H. and K. Struhl, The Cyc8-Tup1 complex inhibits transcription primarily by masking the activation domain of the recruiting protein. Genes Dev, 2011. 25(23): p. 2525-39.
54. Chen, G. and A.J. Courey, Groucho/TLE family proteins and transcriptional repression. Gene, 2000. 249(1-2): p. 1-16.
55. van der Voorn, L. and H.L. Ploegh, The WD-40 repeat. FEBS Lett, 1992. 307(2): p. 131-4.
56. Smith, T.F., et al., The WD repeat: a common architecture for diverse functions. Trends in Biochemical Sciences, 1999. 24(5): p. 181-5.
57. Zhang, Z., et al., Mutations of the WD repeats that compromise Tup1 repression function maintain structural integrity of the WD domain trypsin-resistant core. Arch Biochem Biophys, 2002. 406(1): p. 47-54.
58. Zhang, Z., U. Varanasi, and R.J. Trumbly, Functional dissection of the global repressor Tup1 in yeast: dominant role of the C-terminal repression domain. Genetics, 2002. 161(3): p. 957-69.
59. Edmondson, D.G., M.M. Smith, and S.Y. Roth, Repression domain of the yeast global repressor Tup1 interacts directly with histones H3 and H4. Genes Dev, 1996. 10(10): p. 1247-59.
60. Conlan, R.S., et al., The Tup1-Cyc8 protein complex can shift from a transcriptional co-repressor to a transcriptional co-activator. Journal of Biological Chemistry, 1999. 274(1): p. 205-10.
61. Malave, T.M. and S.Y. Dent, Transcriptional repression by Tup1-Ssn6. Biochemistry and Cell Biology-Biochimie Et Biologie Cellulaire, 2006. 84(4): p. 437-43.
62. Davie, J.K., R.J. Trumbly, and S.Y. Dent, Histone-dependent association of Tup1-Ssn6 with repressed genes in vivo. Molecular and Cellular Biology, 2002. 22(3): p. 693-703.
63. Watson, A.D., et al., Ssn6-Tup1 interacts with class I histone deacetylases required for repression. Genes Dev, 2000. 14(21): p. 2737-44.
64. Wu, J., et al., TUP1 utilizes histone H3/H2B-specific HDA1 deacetylase to repress gene activity in yeast. Mol Cell, 2001. 7(1): p. 117-26.
65. Li, B. and J.C. Reese, Ssn6-Tup1 regulates RNR3 by positioning nucleosomes and affecting the chromatin structure at the upstream repression sequence. Journal of Biological Chemistry, 2001. 276(36): p. 33788-97.
66. Fleming, A.B. and S. Pennings, Antagonistic remodelling by Swi-Snf and Tup1-Ssn6 of an extensive chromatin region forms the background for FLO1 gene regulation. Embo Journal, 2001. 20(18): p. 5219-31.
67. Kastaniotis, A.J., et al., Roles of transcription factor Mot3 and chromatin in repression of the hypoxic gene ANB1 in yeast. Molecular and Cellular Biology, 2000. 20(19): p. 7088-98.
68. Patterton, H.G. and R.T. Simpson, Nucleosomal location of the STE6 TATA box and Mat alpha 2p-mediated repression. Molecular and Cellular Biology, 1994. 14(6): p. 4002-10.
69. Saito, S., et al., The role of nucleosome positioning in repression by the yeast alpha 2/Mcm1p repressor. Nucleic Acids Res Suppl, 2002(2): p. 93-4.
70. Shimizu, M., et al., Nucleosomes are positioned with base pair precision adjacent to the alpha 2 operator in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Embo Journal, 1991. 10(10): p. 3033-41.
71. Redd, M.J., M.R. Stark, and A.D. Johnson, Accessibility of alpha 2-repressed promoters to the activator Gal4. Molecular and Cellular Biology, 1996. 16(6): p. 2865-9.
72. Lee, M., S. Chatterjee, and K. Struhl, Genetic analysis of the role of Pol II holoenzyme components in repression by the Cyc8-Tup1 corepressor in yeast. Genetics, 2000. 155(4): p. 1535-42.
73. Zhang, Z. and J.C. Reese, Redundant mechanisms are used by Ssn6-Tup1 in repressing chromosomal gene transcription in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Journal of Biological Chemistry, 2004. 279(38): p. 39240-50.
74. Haruki, H., J. Nishikawa, and U.K. Laemmli, The anchor-away technique: rapid, conditional establishment of yeast mutant phenotypes. Mol Cell, 2008. 31(6): p. 925-32.
75. Fragiadakis, G.S., D. Tzamarias, and D. Alexandraki, Nhp6 facilitates Aft1 binding and Ssn6 recruitment, both essential for FRE2 transcriptional activation. Embo Journal, 2004. 23(2): p. 333-42.
76. Mennella, T.A., L.G. Klinkenberg, and R.S. Zitomer, Recruitment of Tup1-Ssn6 by yeast hypoxic genes and chromatin-independent exclusion of TATA binding protein. Eukaryotic Cell, 2003. 2(6): p. 1288-303.
77. Proft, M. and K. Struhl, Hog1 kinase converts the Sko1-Cyc8-Tup1 repressor complex into an activator that recruits SAGA and SWI/SNF in response to osmotic stress. Mol Cell, 2002. 9(6): p. 1307-17.
78. Zhang, Z. and J.C. Reese, Molecular genetic analysis of the yeast repressor Rfx1/Crt1 reveals a novel two-step regulatory mechanism. Molecular and Cellular Biology, 2005. 25(17): p. 7399-411.
79. Schuller, H.J., Transcriptional control of nonfermentative metabolism in the yeast Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Curr Genet, 2003. 43(3): p. 139-60.
80. Treitel, M.A. and M. Carlson, Repression by SSN6-TUP1 is directed by MIG1, a repressor/activator protein. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A, 1995. 92(8): p. 3132-6.
81. Santangelo, G.M., Glucose signaling in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Microbiol Mol Biol Rev, 2006. 70(1): p. 253-82.
82. Lutfiyya, L.L., et al., Characterization of three related glucose repressors and genes they regulate in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Genetics, 1998. 150(4): p. 1377-91.
83. Greatrix, B.W. and H.J. van Vuuren, Expression of the HXT13, HXT15 and HXT17 genes in Saccharomyces cerevisiae and stabilization of the HXT1 gene transcript by sugar-induced osmotic stress. Curr Genet, 2006. 49(4): p. 205-17.
84. Huang, M., Z. Zhou, and S.J. Elledge, The DNA replication and damage checkpoint pathways induce transcription by inhibition of the Crt1 repressor. Cell, 1998. 94(5): p. 595-605.
85. Zaim, J., E. Speina, and A.M. Kierzek, Identification of new genes regulated by the Crt1 transcription factor, an effector of the DNA damage checkpoint pathway in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Journal of Biological Chemistry, 2005. 280(1): p. 28-37.
86. Kumar, D., et al., Highly mutagenic and severely imbalanced dNTP pools can escape detection by the S-phase checkpoint. Nucleic Acids Research, 2010. 38(12): p. 3975-83.
87. Rep, M., et al., The Saccharomyces cerevisiae Sko1p transcription factor mediates HOG pathway-dependent osmotic regulation of a set of genes encoding enzymes implicated in protection from oxidative damage. Molecular Microbiology, 2001. 40(5): p. 1067-83.
88. Chen, C.N., et al., Associating protein activities with their genes: rapid identification of a gene encoding a methylglyoxal reductase in the yeast Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Yeast, 2003. 20(6): p. 545-54.
89. Conlan, R.S. and D. Tzamarias, Sfl1 functions via the co-repressor Ssn6-Tup1 and the cAMP-dependent protein kinase Tpk2. Journal of Molecular Biology, 2001. 309(5): p. 1007-1015.
90. Pan, X.W. and J. Heitman, Protein kinase A operates a molecular switch that governs yeast pseudohyphal differentiation. Molecular and Cellular Biology, 2002. 22(12): p. 3981-3993.
91. Rupp, S., et al., MAP kinase and cAMP filamentation signaling pathways converge on the unusually large promoter of the yeast FLO11 gene. Embo Journal, 1999. 18(5): p. 1257-1269.
92. Palkova, Z. and L. Vachova, Life within a community: benefit to yeast long-term survival. Fems Microbiology Reviews, 2006. 30(5): p. 806-824.
93. Vopalenska, I., et al., Role of distinct dimorphic transitions in territory colonizing and formation of yeast colony architecture. Environmental Microbiology, 2010. 12(1): p. 264-277.
94. Gagiano, M., F.F. Bauer, and I.S. Pretorius, The sensing of nutritional status and the relationship to filamentous growth in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Fems Yeast Research, 2002. 2(4): p. 433-470.
95. Verstrepen, K.J., et al., Yeast flocculation: what brewers should know. Applied Microbiology and Biotechnology, 2003. 61(3): p. 197-205.
96. Verstrepen, K.J. and F.M. Klis, Flocculation, adhesion and biofilm formation in yeasts. Molecular Microbiology, 2006. 60(1): p. 5-15.
97. Bruckner, S. and H.U. Mosch, Choosing the right lifestyle: adhesion and development in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. FEMS Microbiol Rev, 2012. 36(1): p. 25-58.
98. Dranginis, A.M., et al., A biochemical guide to yeast adhesins: Glycoproteins for social and antisocial occasions. Microbiology and Molecular Biology Reviews, 2007. 71(2): p. 282-+.
99. Guo, B., et al., A Saccharomyces gene family involved in invasive growth, cell-cell adhesion, and mating. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 2000. 97(22): p. 12158-12163.
100. Van Mulders, S.E., et al., Phenotypic diversity of Flo protein family-mediated adhesion in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Fems Yeast Research, 2009. 9(2): p. 178-190.
101. Verstrepen, K.J., T.B. Reynolds, and G.R. Fink, Origins of variation in the fungal cell surface. Nature Reviews Microbiology, 2004. 2(7): p. 533-540.
102. Douglas, L.M., et al., Expression and characterization of the flocculin Flo11/Muc1, a Saccharomyces cerevisiae mannoprotein with homotypic properties of adhesion. Eukaryotic Cell, 2007. 6(12): p. 2214-2221.
103. Masy, C.L., A. Henquinet, and M.M. Mestdagh, Flocculation of Saccharomyces-Cerevisiae - Inhibition by Sugars. Canadian Journal of Microbiology, 1992. 38(12): p. 1298-1306.
104. Miki, B.L., et al., Possible mechanism for flocculation interactions governed by gene FLO1 in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Journal of Bacteriology, 1982. 150(2): p. 878-89.
105. Lo, W.S. and A.M. Dranginis, The cell surface flocculin Flo11 is required for pseudohyphae formation and invasion by Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Molecular Biology of the Cell, 1998. 9(1): p. 161-171.
106. Reynolds, T.B. and G.R. Fink, Bakers' yeast, a model for fungal biofilm formation. Science, 2001. 291(5505): p. 878-881.
107. Monds, R.D. and G.A. O'Toole, The developmental model of microbial biofilms: ten years of a paradigm up for review. Trends in Microbiology, 2009. 17(2): p. 73-87.
108. Recht, J., et al., Genetic analysis of sliding motility in Mycobacterium smegmatis. Journal of Bacteriology, 2000. 182(15): p. 4348-4351.
109. Gancedo, J.M., The early steps of glucose signalling in yeast. Fems Microbiology Reviews, 2008. 32(4): p. 673-704.
110. Tamaki, H., Glucose-stimulated cAMP-protein kinase A pathway in yeast Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Journal of Bioscience and Bioengineering, 2007. 104(4): p. 245-250.
111. Robertson, L.S., et al., The yeast A kinases differentially regulate iron uptake and respiratory function. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 2000. 97(11): p. 5984-5988.
112. Lee, J.H., K. Maskos, and R. Huber, Structural and Functional Studies of the Yeast Class II Hda1 Histone Deacetylase Complex. Journal of Molecular Biology, 2009. 391(4): p. 744-757.
113. Bumgarner, S.L., et al., Toggle involving cis-interfering noncoding RNAs controls variegated gene expression in yeast. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 2009. 106(43): p. 18321-18326.
114. Garcia-Sanchez, S., et al., Global roles of Ssn6 in Tup1- and Nrg1-dependent gene regulation in the fungal pathogen, Candida albicans. Molecular Biology of the Cell, 2005. 16(6): p. 2913-2925.
115. Trapnell, C., et al., Differential gene and transcript expression analysis of RNA-seq experiments with TopHat and Cufflinks. Nat Protoc, 2012. 7(3): p. 562-78.
116. Liti, G., et al., Population genomics of domestic and wild yeasts. Nature, 2009. 458(7236): p. 337-41.
117. Dowell, R.D., et al., Genotype to phenotype: a complex problem. Science, 2010. 328(5977): p. 469.
118. Wang, Z., M. Gerstein, and M. Snyder, RNA-Seq: a revolutionary tool for transcriptomics. Nature Reviews Genetics, 2009. 10(1): p. 57-63.
119. Namy, O., et al., Identification of stop codon readthrough genes in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Nucleic Acids Research, 2003. 31(9): p. 2289-96.
120. Cohen, B.D., et al., Induction and repression of DAN1 and the family of anaerobic mannoprotein genes in Saccharomyces cerevisiae occurs through a complex array of regulatory sites. Nucleic Acids Research, 2001. 29(3): p. 799-808.
121. Lorenz, M.C. and J. Heitman, Regulators of pseudohyphal differentiation in Saccharomyces cerevisiae identified through multicopy suppressor analysis in ammonium permease mutant strains. Genetics, 1998. 150(4): p. 1443-57.
122. Kobayashi, N., et al., Structure and functional analysis of the multistress response gene DDR2 from Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Biochem Biophys Res Commun, 1996. 229(2): p. 540-7.
123. Sunnarborg, S.W., et al., Expression of the yeast glycogen phosphorylase gene is regulated by stress-response elements and by the HOG MAP kinase pathway. Yeast, 2001. 18(16): p. 1505-14.
124. Rodriguez, A., et al., The hexokinase 2 protein regulates the expression of the GLK1, HXK1 and HXK2 genes of Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Biochem J, 2001. 355(Pt 3): p. 625-31.
125. Teste, M.A., J.M. Francois, and J.L. Parrou, Characterization of a new multigene family encoding isomaltases in the yeast Saccharomyces cerevisiae, the IMA family. Journal of Biological Chemistry, 2010. 285(35): p. 26815-24.
126. Hartig, A., et al., Differentially regulated malate synthase genes participate in carbon and nitrogen metabolism of S. cerevisiae. Nucleic Acids Research, 1992. 20(21): p. 5677-86.
127. Whan, V., et al., Bovine proteins containing poly-glutamine repeats are often polymorphic and enriched for components of transcriptional regulatory complexes. BMC Genomics, 2010. 11: p. 654.
128. Sambrook, J. and D.W. Russell, Identification of associated proteins by coimmunoprecipitation. CSH Protoc, 2006. 2006(1).
129. Park, P.J., ChIP-seq: advantages and challenges of a maturing technology. Nature Reviews Genetics, 2009. 10(10): p. 669-80.
130. Chan, E.T. and J.M. Cherry, Considerations for creating and annotating the budding yeast Genome Map at SGD: a progress report. Database (Oxford), 2012. 2012: p. bar057.
131. Guglielmi, B., et al., A high resolution protein interaction map of the yeast Mediator complex. Nucleic Acids Research, 2004. 32(18): p. 5379-91.
132. Mizuno, T. and S. Harashima, Gal11 is a general activator of basal transcription, whose activity is regulated by the general repressor Sin4 in yeast. Mol Genet Genomics, 2003. 269(1): p. 68-77.
133. Xu, Z. and K. Tsurugi, Role of Gts1p in regulation of energy-metabolism oscillation in continuous cultures of the yeast Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Yeast, 2007. 24(3): p. 161-70.
134. Yaguchi, S., et al., The pleiotropic effect of the GTS1 gene product on heat tolerance, sporulation and the life span of Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Biochem Biophys Res Commun, 1996. 218(1): p. 234-7.
135. Duncan, I.W., Transvection effects in Drosophila. Annual Review of Genetics, Vol 44, 2002. 36: p. 521-56.
136. Tweedie, S., et al., FlyBase: enhancing Drosophila Gene Ontology annotations. Nucleic Acids Research, 2009. 37(Database issue): p. D555-9.
137. Chen, E.H. and E.N. Olson, Towards a molecular pathway for myoblast fusion in Drosophila. Trends Cell Biol, 2004. 14(8): p. 452-60.
138. Pascual, M., et al., The Muscleblind family of proteins: an emerging class of regulators of developmentally programmed alternative splicing. Differentiation, 2006. 74(2-3): p. 65-80.
139. Eppig, J.T., et al., The Mouse Genome Database (MGD): comprehensive resource for genetics and genomics of the laboratory mouse. Nucleic Acids Research, 2012. 40(Database issue): p. D881-6.
140. Dimmer, E.C., et al., The UniProt-GO Annotation database in 2011. Nucleic Acids Research, 2012. 40(Database issue): p. D565-70.
141. Opdenakker, G., P.E. Van den Steen, and J. Van Damme, Gelatinase B: a tuner and amplifier of immune functions. Trends Immunol, 2001. 22(10): p. 571-9.
142. Goldstrohm, A.C., et al., The transcription elongation factor CA150 interacts with RNA polymerase II and the pre-mRNA splicing factor SF1. Molecular and Cellular Biology, 2001. 21(22): p. 7617-28.
143. Holbert, S., et al., The Gln-Ala repeat transcriptional activator CA150 interacts with huntingtin: neuropathologic and genetic evidence for a role in Huntington's disease pathogenesis. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A, 2001. 98(4): p. 1811-6.