Ainsworth, S., Gelmini-Hornsby, G., Threapleton, K., Crook, C., O’Malley, C., & Buda, M. (2011). Anonymity in classroom voting and debating. Learning and Instruction, 21, 365-378.
Baker,M., & Lund, K. (1997). Promoting reflective interactions in a CSCL environment. Journal of Computer Assisted Learning,13(3), 175-193.
Barwell, G. & Walker, R. (2009) Peer assessment of oral presentations using clickers: the student experience, in The Student Experience, Proceedings of the 32nd HERDSA Annual Conference, Darwin, 6-9 July 2009, pp. 23-32.
Beatty, I.D., Gerace, W.J. (2009). Technology-enhanced formative assessment: A research-based pedagogy for teaching science with classroom response technology. Journal of Science Education and Technology, 18, 146-162.
Beernaert, L. (2011). Peer-assessment in het hoger onderwijs: het verhogen van anonimiteit door middel van responstechnologie. Niet gepubliceerde scriptie, Gent, Vakgroep Onderwijskunde.
Birenbaum, M. (2003). New Insights into Learning and Teaching and Their Implications for Assessment. In M. Segers, F. Dochy, & E. Cascallar (eds.), Optimising New Modes of Assessment: In Search of Qualities and Standards (pp.13-37). Dordrecht, Boston, London: Kluwer Academic Publishers.
Birenbaum, M., Breuer, K., Cascallar, E., Dochy, F., Dori, Y., Ridgway, J., Wiesemes, R. (2006). A learning Integrated Assessment System. Educational Research Review, 1, 61–67.
Bloxham, S. & West, A. (2004) Understanding the rules of the game: marking peer assessment as a medium for developing students’ conceptions of assessment. Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education, 29(6), 721-733.
Boekaerts, M. (2010). The crucial role on motivation and emotion in classroom learning. In H. Dumont, D. Istance & F. Benavides (Eds.), The Nature of Learning. Using research to inspire practice (pp. 91-108). Frankrijk: OECD publishing.
Bostock; S. (2000). Student peer assessment. Retrieved December 18, 2011, from http://www.palatine.ac.uk/files/994.pdf
Boud, D. (2000). Sustainable assessment: rethinking assessment for the learning society. Studies in continuing education, 22(2), 151-167.
Boud, D., & Falchikov, N. (1989). Quantitative studies of self-assessment in higher education: a critical analysis of findings. Higher Education, 18, 529-549.
Boud, D., Cohen, R., & Sampson, J. (1999). Peer learning and assessment. Assessment and Evaluation in Higher Education, 24(9), 413-426.
Brown, S. & Dove, P. (1991). Opening mouths to change feet: some views on self and peer assessment, in: BROWN, S. & DOVE, P. (Eds), Self and Peer Assessment (Standing Conference on Educational Development), pp. 59-65.
Caldwell, J. E. (2007). Clickers in the Large Classroom: Current Research and Best Practice Tips. CBE Life Sciences Education, 6(1), 9-20.
Cheng, W., & Warren, M. (1997). Having second thoughts: student perceptions before and after a peer assessment exercise. Studies in Higher Education, 22, 233-239.
Chinn, D. (2005). Peer-assessment in the algorithms course. ITiCSE '05 Proceedings of the 10th annual SIGCSE conference on Innovation and technology in computer science education, 37(3), 69-73.
Cohen, S., Kamarck, T., & Mermelstein, R. (1983). A global measure of perceived stress. Journal of Health and Social Behaviour, 24, 386-396.
Conroy, D.E. (2002). The Performance Failure Appraisal Inventory. User’s Manual. Retrieved April 21, 2011,from http://www.personal.psu.edu/dec9/uploads/3/0/4/0/304067/2003_pfai_users_manual.pdf
Dancer, W.T., & Dancer, L. (1992). Peer rating in higher education. Journal of Education for Business, 67, 306-309.
de Corte, E. (2010). Historical developments in the understanding of learning. In H. Dumont, D. Istance & F. Benavides (Eds.), The Nature of Learning. Using research to ...inspire practice (pp. 35-60). Frankrijk: OECD publishing.
De Grez, L., Valcke, M., Berings, D. (2010). Student response system and learning oral presentation skills. Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences, 2, 1786-1789.
De Leeuwe, M. (2008). De invloed van technologie in het juiste perspectief. DEVELOP, 4,
58 – 67.
Deal, A. (2007). Classroom Response Systems. Teaching with Technology. Retrieved April 21, 2011, from http://www.cmu.edu/teaching/resources/PublicationsArchives/StudiesWhitepapers/ClassroomResponse_Nov07.pdf
Dennis, I., Newstead, S.E., Wright, D.E. (1996). A new approach to exploring bias in educational assessment. British Journal of Psychology, 87(4), 515-534.
Deprez, I., & Lieveyns, S. (2004). Competentiegericht onderwijs. Begeleid zelfstandig studeren, 9, 1-22.
Dierick, S., Dochy, F., & Van de Watering, G. (2001). Assessment in hoger onderwijs: over de implicaties van nieuwe toetsvormen voor de edumetrie. Tijdschrift voor hoger onderwijs,19(3), 2-18.
Dochy, F, L. Heylen en H. van de Mosselaer (2002). Assessment in onderwijs. Nieuwe toetsvormen en examinering in studentgericht onderwijs en competentiegericht onderwijs. Utrecht: Lemma.
Dochy, F., & Segers, M. (2001). New Assessment Forms in Problem-based Learning: .the value-added of the students’perspective. Studies in Higher Education, 36(3), 327-343.
Dochy, F., Admiraal, W. & Pilot, A. (2003). Peer-en co-assessment als instrument voor diepgaand leren: bevindingen en richtlijnen. Tijdschrift voor hoger onderwijs, 21(4), 220 - 230.
Dochy, F., Heylen, L., & Van de Mosselaer, H. (2000). Assessment in onderwijs. Utrecht: Lemma.
Dochy, F., Segers, M., & Sluijsmans, D. (1999). The use of Self-, Peer and Co-.assessment in higher education : a review. Studies in higher education, 24(3), 331-350.
Draper, S. & Brown, M. (2002). Use of the PRS (Personal Response System) handsets at Glasgow University, Interim Report. Retrieved April 22, 2011, from http://www.psy.gla.ac.uk/%7Esteve/ilig/interim.html
Dumont, H., & Istance, D. (2010). Analysing and designing learning environments for the 21st century. In H. Dumont, D. Istance & F. Benavides (Eds.), The Nature of Learning. Using research to inspire practice (pp. 19-32). Frankrijk: OECD publishing.
Easy Graphics/Assessment Technogies (2008-2009). Why use an SRS? Retrieved April 25, 2011, from http://www.easygraphics.com/why-use-an-srs-/info_18.html
Falchikov, N. (1995). Improving feedback to and from students. In P.Knight (Ed.), Assessment for learning in higher education (pp. 157-166). London: Kogan Page.
Falchikov, N., & Goldfinch, J. (2000). Student peer-assessment in higher education: A meta-analysis comparing peer and teacher marks. Review of Educational Research, 70(3), 287-322.
Fraser, B.J.; Anderson, G.J., & Walberg, H.J. (1982). Assessment of Learning Environments: Manual for Learning Environment Inventory and My Class Inventory. Perth: Western Institute of Technology.
Gardner, J. (2006). Assessment and Learning. London: Sage.
Gielen, D., Dochy, F., Onghena, P., Janssens, S., & Decuyper, S. (2007). A complementary role for peer feedback and staff feedback in powerful learning environments. In D. Gielen (Ed.), Peer assessment als a tool for learning (pp.157-199). Leuven: KATHOLIEKE UNIVERSITEIT LEUVEN. Faculteit Psychologie en Pedagogische Wetenschappen Centrum voor Opleidingsdidactiek.
Gielen, S. (2007). Peer-assessment as a tool for learning. Doctoraat KU leuven.
Gielen, S., Peeters, E., Dochy, F., Onghena, P., & Struyben, K. (2010a). Improving the effectiveness of peer feedback for learning, Learning and instruction, 20(4), 304-315.
Gielen, S., Tops, L., Dochy, F., Onghena, P., & Smeets, S. (2010b). A comparative study of peer and teacher feedback forms in a secondary writing curriculum. British Educational Research Journal, 36(1), 143-164.
Harlen, W. (2006). On the Relationship between Assessment for Formative and Summative Purposes. In J. Gardner (Ed.), Assessment and Learning (p. 104). London: Sage Publications Ltd.
Howard, C.D., Barret, A.F., & Frick, T.W. (2010). Anonimity to promote peer feedback: preservice teacher’s comments in asynchrous computer-mediated communication. Journal of Educational Computing Research, 43, 89-112.
Hunt, N., Hughes, J., & Rowe, G. (2002). Formative Automated Computer Testing (FACT). British Journal of Educational Technology, 33(5), 525-535.
Jonassen, D.H. & Kwon, H.I. (2001). Communication patterns in computer-mediated vs. face-to-face group problem solving. Educational Technology: Research and Development, 49(10), 35-52.
Jonassen, D.H., & Land, S.M. (2000). Theoretical foundations of learning environments. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Eribaum.
Kane, J.S., & Lawler, E.E. (1978). Methods of peer assessment. Psychological Bulletin, 85, 555-586.
Kaufman, J.H., & Schunn, C.D. (2010). Students’ perceptions about peer assessment for writing: Their origin and impact on revision work. Instructional Science, 39, 387-406.
Kay (2009b). A formative analysis of interactive classroom communication systems used in secondary school classrooms. In L.Tan Wee Hin & R. Subramaniam (Eds.), Handbook of research on new media literacy at the K-12 level: issues and challenges (p. 720-742). New York: Information Science Reference.
Kay, R. (2009). Examining gender differences in attitudes toward interactive classroom communications systems (ICCS). Computers & education, 52, 730-740.
Kay, R., & Knaack, L. (2009). Exploring the use of audience response systems in
secondary school science classrooms. Journal of Science Education and Technology, 18(5), 382-392.
Kay, R., Lesage, A., & Knaack, L. (2010). Examining the use of audience response systems in secondary school classrooms: a formative analysis. Journal of Interactive Learning Research, 21(3), 343-365.
Kay,R., & Knaack, L. (2009b). Exploring individual differences in attitudes toward audience response systems. Canadian Journal of Learning and Technology, 35(1), 1-20.
Kollar, I., & Fischer, F. (2010). Peer assessment as collaborative learning: A cognitive perspective. Learning and Instruction, 20(4), 344-348. doi: DOI 10.1016 / j. Learninstruc.2009.08.005
Liu, N. (2009). Literature review: how to effectively use SRS in the elementary classroom. Retrieved May, 5, 2011, from http://scholarspace.manoa.hawaii.edu/bitstream/handle/10125/15405/Liu_LiteratureReview.pdf?sequence=1
Lu, R., & Bol, L. (2007). A Comparison of Anonymous Versus Identifiable e-Peer Review on College Student Writing Performance and the Extent of Critical Feedback. Journal of interactive Online Learning, 6, 100-115.
Martyn, M. (2007). Clickers in the Classroom: An Active Learning Approach. EDUCAUSE Quarterly Magazine, 30(2), 71-74.
Mayer, R.E. (2010). Learning with technology. In H. Dumont, D. Istance & F. Benavides (Eds.), The Nature of Learning. Using research to inspire practice (pp. 179-196). Frankrijk: OECD publishing.
Nieweg, M. (2002). Leren van toetsen: op weg naar een nieuw model. Tijdschrift voor hoger onderwijs, 20(1), 42-59.
Noonan, B., & Duncan, R. (2005). Peer and Self-assessment in high schools. Practical assessment. Research and evaluation, 10(17), 1-8.
Orsmond, P., Merry, S., & Reiling, K. (1996). The importance of marking criteria in the use of peer assessment. Assessment and Evaluation in higher education, 21, 239-249.
Penuel, W.R., Boscardin, C.K., Masyn, K., & Crawford, V.M. (2007). Teaching with student response systems in elementary and secondary education settings: A survey study. Educational Technology, Research and Development, 55(4), 315-346.
Pond, K., Uo-Haq, R., & Wade, W. (1995). Peer review: a precursor to peer assessment. Innovations in Education and Training International, 32, 314-323.
Pope, N.K.L. (2005). The impact of stress in self- and peer assessment. Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education, 30(1), 51-63.
Prensky, M. (2001). Digital Natives, digital immigrants. On the horizon, 9(5), 1-6.
Raes, A., Vanderhoven, E., & Schellens, T. (Submitted). Increasing anonymity in peer assessment within a face-to-face setting by using Classroom Response Technology. Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education.
Reichert, M. (2004). Literatuurstudie: Best Practices van Assessment (elektronische versie). Digitale Universiteit.
Robinson, J.M. (2002). In search of Fairness: an application of multi-reviewer anonymous peer review in a large class. Journal of Further and Higher Education,26, 183-192.
Rooks, T., Wilson, J. (2010). Turning technologies student response systems transforming the K-12 learning experience. Retrieved May 5, 2011, from www.turningtechnologies.com/.../TransformingTheLearningExperience_Final.pdf
Rooks,T., & Wilson, J. (2010). Turning Technologies Student Response Systems Transforming the K-12 Learning Experience. Retrieved April 25,2011 from www.TurningTechnologies.com
Sadler, P.M., & Good, E. (2006). The impact of self- and peer grading on student learning. Educational Assessment, 11, 1-31
Sambell, K., McDowell, L, & Brown, S. (1997). “But what is fair?” An exploratory study of student perceptions of the consequential validity of assessment. Studies in Educational Evaluation, 23(4), 349-371.
Sartori, T.M. (2009). An empirical investigation of electronic student response systems in a K-12 school district: The relationship of ongoing assessment on student achievement. Retrieved April 25, 2011, from http://turningtalk.turningtechnologies.com/resources/categories.cfm?catid=520
Segers, M. (2004). Assessment en leren als een twee-eenheid : onderzoek naar de impact van assessment op leren. Tijdschrift voor hoger onderwijs; 22(4), 188-219.
Shepard, L.A. (2000). The role of assessment in a learning culture. Educational Researcher, 29(7), 4-14.
Siau, K., Sheng, H., & Nah, F.F.H. (2006). Use of a classroom Response system to Enhance Classroom Interactivity. Retrieved December 22, 2011, from http://digitalcommons.unl.edu/managementfacpub/26/
Simpson,V., & Oliver, M. (2002). Using electronic voting systems in lectures. UCL Internal report. Retrieved April 22, 2011, from http://www.ucl.ac.uk/learningtechnology/examples/ElectronicVotingSystems.pdf
Sinke, G. (2006). Aan de slag met assessment. OAB Dekkers.
Sluijsmans, D. (2002). Student involvement in assessment: The training of peer-assessment skills. Proefschrift Open Universiteit Heerlen.
Sluijsmans, D.M.A., Brand-Gruwel, S., van Merriënboer, J.J.G., Bastiaens, T.J. (2003). The training of peer assessment skills to promote the development of reflection skills in teacher education. Studies in Educational Evaluation, 29, 23-42.
Stepanyan, K., Mather, R., Jones, H., & Lusuardi, C. (2009). Student Engagement with Peer Assessment: A Review of Pedagogical Design and Technologies. Lecture Notes in Computer Science, 5686, 367-375.
Stiggins, R.J. (1991). Facing the challenges of a new era of educational assessment. Applied measurement in education, 4(4), 263-273.
Stoffel, K. (2005). Self, peer en co-assessment. Retrieved 22 december, 2011, from http://gwillem.home.xs4all.nl/ConsTechniek/PersManagKees/assessment%20concept%202.htm
Struyf, E. (2000). Evalueren: een leerkans voor leraren en leerlingen. Over de evaluatiepraktijk in de klas en het evaluatiebeleid op school. (Studia Paedagogica 26). Leuven: Universitaire Pers.
Topping, K.J. (1998). Peer-assessment between students in college and university. Review of Educational Research, 68(3), 249-276.
Topping, K.J. (2009). Peer-assessment. Theory Into Practice, 48(1), 20-27.
Tseng, S. C., Tsai, C.C. (2007). Online peer-assessment and the role of peer feedback: A study of high school computer course. Computers and education, 49, 1161-1174.
Tsivitanidou, O.E., Zachaia, Z.C., & Hovardos, T. (2011). Investigating secondary school students’ unmediated peer assessment skills. Learning and Instruction, 21, 506-519.
Van den Bossche, P., Gijselaers, W., Segers, M., & Kirschner, P. A. (2006). Social and cognitive factors driving teamwork in collaborative learning environments: team learning beliefs and behaviors. Small Group Research, 37, 490-521.
Van der Werf, G. (2006). Oud of nieuw leren? Of liever gewoon léren? Pedagogische Studiën, 83, 74-81.
van Gennip, N. A. E., Segers, M. S. R., & Tillema, H. H. (2010). Peer assessment as a collaborative learning activity: The role of interpersonal variables and conceptions. Learning and Instuction, 20, 280-290.
van Zundert, M., Sluijsmans, D., & van Merriënboer, J. (2010). Effective peer assessment processes: Research findings and future directions. Learning and Instruction, 20, 270-279.
Voss, J.F., Wiley, J., Carretero, M. (1995). Acquiring intellectual skills. Annuals Reviews of Psychology, 46, 155-181.
Webb, M. (2011) Feedback enabled by new technologies as a key component of pedagogy. Retrieved May 5, 2011,from http://editlib.org/p/36844
Wolf, D., Bixby, J., Glenn, J., Gardner, H. (1991).To use their minds well: investigating new forms of student assessment. Review of Research in Education, 17, 31-74.
Wuyts, R. (2006). Nieuw Netwerk Nederlands 6A werkboek. Wommelgem:Van In.
Yang, M., Badger, R., & Yu, Z. (2006). A comparative study of peer and teacher feedback in a Chinese EFL writing class. Journal of Second Language Writing, 15, 179-200.
Yang, Y.F., & Tsai, C.C. (2010). Conceptions of and approaches to learning through online peer assessment. Learning and Instruction, 20, 72-83.
Zhu, E. (2007). Teaching with clickers. Center for Research on Learning and Teaching. Retrieved April 22, 2011, from http://www.crlt.umich.edu/publinks/CRLT_no22.pdf